But, how does the public reaction compare with past scandals? On March 24, The Atlantic published a story stating one of its editors had been inadvertently added to a Signal group chat with senior ...

Damage control is not supposed to cause more damage, but that is what President Trump’s team has created with its reaction to the Signal leak story. As we all know, in the days before U.S ...

As senior officials deny wrongdoing, rank-and-file national-security personnel worry about the dangers if no one is held ...

To the surprise of nobody who pays attention, it turns out that the entirety of the Trump administration lied about what was in that viral Signal chat. They lied to the public. They lied to Congress.

Social media users were quick to seize on to memes and jokes after The Atlantic's top editor was added to a national security group chat on Signal.

The Trump administration’s Signal chat leak represents the "profound ... this leak is different due to the Trump administration’s reaction of "there was nothing to see here." ...

US president defends key security official after journalist says he was added to group chat about air strikes.

In the age of digital communication, the fallout from the recent Signal group chat leak has captured the public's attention and prompted significant discussions about national security. This incident ...

Nahal Toosi is POLITICO’s senior foreign affairs correspondent. She has reported on war, genocide and political chaos in a career that has taken her around the world. Her reported column, Compass, ...

President Donald Trump appeared to place the blame for the Signal chat scandal on national ... told reporters before calling the media’s reaction to the scandal a "witch hunt." ...

Most Americans believe the Signal chat scandal that embroiled President Donald Trump’s administration is a major concern, polling shows. But, how does the public reaction compare with past scandals?