But, how does the public reaction compare with past scandals? On March 24, The Atlantic published a story stating one of its editors had been inadvertently added to a Signal group chat with senior ...

Nahal Toosi is POLITICO’s senior foreign affairs correspondent. She has reported on war, genocide and political chaos in a career that has taken her around the world. Her reported column, Compass, ...

US president defends key security official after journalist says he was added to group chat about air strikes.

As the White House comes under fire for allegedly using Signal to discuss foreign policy plans, the encrypted messaging platform has now come into the spotlight.

To the surprise of nobody who pays attention, it turns out that the entirety of the Trump administration lied about what was in that viral Signal chat. They lied to the public. They lied to Congress.

Several House Republicans have also condemned those on the Signal group chat for divulging highly classified information through insecure channels. “None of this should have been sent on non ...

As senior officials deny wrongdoing, rank-and-file national-security personnel worry about the dangers if no one is held ...

The Trump administration’s Signal chat leak represents the "profound ... this leak is different due to the Trump administration’s reaction of "there was nothing to see here." ...

Most Americans believe the Signal chat scandal that embroiled President Donald Trump’s administration is a major concern, polling shows. But, how does the public reaction compare with past scandals?