If an artist’s work can be copied, modified and distributed by AI without consequence, we may have crossed an irrevocable line, argues Aron Solomon of Amplify. In this guest commentary he explains how the loopholes in intellectual property law need reworked to protect human creativity.

The frenzy to create Ghibli-style art using ChatGPT has sparked a heated debate about the ethical concerns of AI-generated art, copyright issues and the future livelihoods of artists.

Sure, it's just some cool images. But it shows the tide is with the customized and the automated — and away from originality.

The challenges posed by AI-generated art necessitate a multifaceted approach that includes revising existing laws, implementing safeguards, and encouraging ethical practices.

Fans of Studio Ghibli, the famed Japanese animation studio behind “Spirited Away” and other beloved movies, were delighted this week when a new version of ChatGPT let them transform popular internet memes or personal photos into the distinct style of Ghibli founder Hayao Miyazaki.

When OpenAI debuted its image-generation feature in ChatGPT last week, social media exploded when users realized that they could make AI-generated images that looked like something out of an animated film from Studio Ghibli.

Open AI's latest update to ChatGPT ignores any prior restraint and jumps headfirst into aping the actual talents of Studio Ghibli.

ChatGPT’s new ability to generate Studio Ghibli-style images has sparked outrage, with artists and fans accusing OpenAI of plagiarism.

As the Ghibli trend takes social media by storm, here's everything you need to know about this viral sensation and the concerns it raises. But why stop there? Also, go beyond the trend and explore the rich and timeless painting traditions of India.